Hammers close to end of Tevez affair

first_img Press Association The Hammers agreed an £18.1million compensation deal with Sheffield United in 2009 over Tevez’s role in keeping the London club in the Premier League in 2007 at the expense of the Blades. Under the compensation deal, the payments were staggered until 2013 – the Blades’ latest accounts confirm that, and that a loan from Santander bank was taken out in 2010 secured against the payments from West Ham. As of June last year, the amount guaranteed stood at £8.5million, and the final £6million payment is due by July. West Ham were fined £5million by a Premier League inquiry for breaching rules governing third-party ownership, but controversially no points were deducted and Tevez was permitted to play in the final three games of the season. The club claimed they had unilaterally terminated their third-party agreement with the players’ advisors, a consortium headed by Kia Joorabchian. Tevez scored in the final match of the season as the Hammers survived and Sheffield United were relegated. The Blades took the case to an independent tribunal which ruled that Tevez had been ineligible to play. Third-party ownership of players is prohibited in English football – on the basis that if one person or company owns a number of players at different clubs it can lead to conflicts of interest. UEFA has now pledged to introduce the same ban across Europe though there is opposition from some clubs, especially in Portugal and Italy, against such a move. But UEFA general secretary Gianni Infantino said: “We think this should be the case all over the world, certainly all over Europe. If FIFA will not do it, we will certainly do it as far as Europe is concerned.” center_img West Ham are close to drawing a line under the costly Carlos Tevez affair with their final payment to Sheffield United to be made before the summer, it can be disclosed.last_img read more

FA set to look at Suarez incident

first_imgLiverpool striker Luis Suarez looks set to face a Football Association investigation after manager Brendan Rodgers labelled his biting of Chelsea’s Branislav Ivanovic “unacceptable”. “Having reviewed the video footage and spoken to Luis, his behaviour is unacceptable and I have made him aware of this,” said Rodgers. The player issued his own apology – something he failed to do adequately when found guilty of racially abusing Manchester United’s Patrice Evra last season, for which he was banned for eight matches – first on Twitter and then via an official club statement. “I am deeply sorry for my inexcusable behaviour earlier today during our match against Chelsea,” he said. “I have issued an apology and have tried to contact Branislav Ivanovic to speak to him personally. I apologise also to my manager, playing colleagues and everyone at Liverpool Football Club for letting them down.” Later in the evening, Suarez returned to Twitter to say he had spoken personally to Ivanovic. “I’ve just spoken to Ivanovic on the phone and I could apologise directly to him. Thanks for accepting,” he wrote. Ayre, having been one of many criticised for a lack of leadership during the Evra affair, took personal charge of the situation and held a meeting with Rodgers after the match in which they reviewed footage and formulated their response. “Luis has made an unreserved apology for his actions,” said Ayre. “His behaviour is not befitting of any player wearing a Liverpool shirt and Luis is aware that he has let himself and everyone associated with the club down. We will deal with the matter internally and await any action from the FA.” Press Associationcenter_img The Uruguay international’s equaliser in the seventh minute of added time to secure a 2-2 draw was lost in yet more controversy to engulf the 26-year-old. Managing director Ian Ayre cancelled a scheduled flight to Australia, where he was due to promote the club’s pre-season tour, to deal swiftly with the fall-out having learned lessons from previous public relations disasters. He described Suarez’s behaviour as “not befitting of any player wearing a Liverpool shirt” and said he would be dealt with internally – most likely by way of a heavy fine. Liverpool stopped short of imposing their own ban on the striker but he is likely to be ruled out for the remainder of the season once the FA’s disciplinary process kicks in. last_img read more